Donor Advised Fund Codes

Options
I'm trying to clean up our codes and other records in RE. I was wondering how you all code Donor Advised Funds (Fidelity, Schwab, Network for Good, etc.) in your RE? 
Tagged:

Comments

  • We have a Gift Attribute of DAF and a table driven description
    made up of the sources of the gift (Fidelity, Schwab, etc). 
    The gift goes in the donor's record with the gift attribute noting
    the source.




    CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE:


    This electronic mail transmission contains confidential
    information

    including Protected Health Information (PHI) that is legally
    privileged.

    If you are not the intended recipient, or designee, you are
    hereby

    notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any
    and

    all attachments to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If
    you

    have received this transmission in error, please notify the
    sender

    immediately to arrange for return or destruction of these
    documents.
  • We use Foundation or Corporate Foundation, depending on the entity.
  • For the individual or family with the soft credit of the DAF do you list the donation as a foundation grant or individual donation?

  • Joan, 1. What coordinates do you include for the DAF Constituent record? 2. Could you share how you describe the entities in each of the suggested relationships? Thanks!

  • Nathalie - I don't know what your first question means. Re #2. The individual is the “Donor” to the DAF which is the “Donor-advised Fund." The donor-advised fund record is a “Donor-Advised Fund” of the overarching Fidelity/Schwab/Community Foundation, etc. record which is the “Foundation” or like code.

  • Joanne - It's a cash gift.

  • Thank you for your answer! My first question was indeed not clear. What I am trying to find out is which coordinates (address, etc.) you include in the Constituent Record for each named DAF. Thanks!

  • I just copy the generic Fidelity / Schwab, etc. address from that master record, and then uncheck Send Mail - since I never want the DAF to be solicited, etc. In my ackowledgement letter process, I send ty letters to the Soft Credit recipients - and then the thank you letter (w/o tax language) merges for the individual(s) who recommended the gift from their advised fund.

  • The way you keep these records coded depends on how you are required to report on them for your org. Different orgs have different types of reporting.

    A constituent code group of Donor Advised Funds - which could be foundations, trusts etc.

    Network for Good, Benevity, YourCause etc are conduits for getting $$ from individual donors and matching gift companies to you. I would not advise having those coded the same way as DAFs.

    All the records would have the same info that you can collect off of checks or their websites for contact info: address, phone, the person who signed the cover letter as a contact in relationships tab. Make sense?

  • Hi Joan, Do I understand that you do not create a relationship between the individual and the overeaching Foundation? (such as for example a “client” relationship?) Also, do you assign a fundraiser tothe named DAF? Thanks!

  • Natalie - I did not say I didn't create relationships. In actuality, I have a constituent record for the individual donor, one for the named DAF at Fidelity or Schwab, etc., and I have another for the parent org - Schwab, Fidelity, our local community foundations, etc.

    I have a donor / DAF relationship between the individual and the DAF records.

    I have a DAF / Foundation relationship between the specific donor-advised fund constituent record and the overarching organization. This allows me, at a glance, to see all the DAFs associated with Fidelity, the ones associated with Schwab, with the Minneapolis Foundation, with the St. Paul Community Foundation. etc.

    And I do assign the same staff fundraiser (we call them Relationship Managers) to the DAF who is assigned to the individual. That allows the staff person to see all the monies that come as hard credits in Dashboards, etc.

    This system works very well and removes all confusion. I've used it at numerous organizations and have trained other RE staff to set their up in this same way.

Categories