Bad Records

Options

Hi Everyone, Just curious as to what everyone does when they have incomplete donor information. For example, I have a first and last name but nothing else, sometimes an email address, but no address. Do you all add them as new records and basically create “bad/dead” records or do you do it another way? Thanks!

Tagged:

Comments

  • I would search to be sure that they are not already in your database. Do a partial name search in case something is misspelled or using a nickname.

    In addition to what others have said – I would not consider them “bad” or “dead” if you are adding them currently. That's a new record, new info. the only reason you would be entering “dead” info is if you were doing a historical/backfill project, or someone was recently deceased. Yes, they are incomplete. ?

  • For my org, it really depends. We're really event-heavy, so we often have records with just a First Name, Last Name, maybe a phone number or email, and which event they attended. I keep those for reporting/historical purposes, even if we have them in an alternate source like One Cause. But I also totally agree with the other comments here re: record creation/anonymous additions, in general.

  • I agree Austen, however if they give through 3rd parties, sometimes that's the only information that they give you. Then you have to make a record unless your company handles it in a different way.

  • @Austen Brown I go along with Austen. If a fundraiser wants them added, they get added but I urge the fundraiser to grab more info for the record to make it complete.

  • We tend to add records for everyone, as many will give again (even if it is just the next time their friend has a Facebook fundraiser for their birthday). We have a policy that all event attendees have a record. If the number of “bad records” was getting out of hand, I would re-evaluate these practices.

  • @Silvia Ochoa Unless they've made a gift or Development asks us to, we only add constituents without addresses if we have at least one piece of contact info, such as email or phone number.

  • Dariel Dixon 2
    Dariel Dixon 2 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seventh Anniversary Facilitator 4 Name Dropper Photogenic

    This is a topic I'm super passionate about. I believe in data integrity and standards. As such, I absolutely refuse to create a record without a name and at least one method of contact. I have made some exceptions only if I know this information is forthcoming imminently. If I don't have this information, then there is nothing to record at all. If it comes in as a gift, then it will be entered as an anonymous donor.

    I always look at the purpose of a database is to be able to record and analyze information. Entering a method of contact is another way to verify a constituent from a possible duplicate record. In addition, having a method of contact makes the record actionable (I don't think this is actually a word, but…) and allows the other parts of our operation to perform their duties. I believe that this is a key step to basic data hygiene.

    That said, every organization will have a different minimum amount of data needed to create a record, but I believe that there needs to be at least one method of contact at a minimum.

  • @Silvia Ochoa we create a record, there are times constituents reach out regarding a donation to an event and we are able to update their record with addresses, emails, consents, etc.

Categories