Deleting Old Records

Options
I'm performing some cleanup, and want to figure out if there is any ideas how long you should wait before deleting old records with no gifts and no actions.  These records that I don't think have much value as there has not been any upkeep with and are no longer being considered for solicitation.  I was curious as to what the community thought about this.

Comments

  • JoAnn Strommen
    JoAnn Strommen Community All-Star
    Ancient Membership 2,500 Likes 2500 Comments Photogenic
    I'm certain there are some users who hold the view of never delete.  I did this type of clean up in prior position. We had added a number of lists of prospects for an earlier capital campaign. As you said, there was no upkeep done for business contacts, still operating, no relationship or address updates. I think they'd been in for at least 5 years. I did some purging. If we wanted them as active prospects in the future they would come in from a new list import. If they are not being considered for solicitation and the other criteria you said, IMO they are just cluttering up the database.  
  • Hi Dariel,

    Organisations subject to GDPR have that covered by their Privacy Policies, eg:
    https://www.league.org.uk/privacy-policy#howlong 

    "Where you do not fall into one of these groups (for instance, if you have only ever signed one of our petitions) we will retain your information for a period of 10 years from your last interaction with us, after which time we will erase it from our records."
  • Well -- this discussion has come up so many times I cannot even count.  There is a whole list of reasons you never delete.

    and I will leave you with this expert's POV/perspective on why you never delete records.

    https://billconnors.com/wp-content/uploads/Raisers-Edge-NXT-Pricing-To-Delete-or-Not-Delete-Constituents.pdf
  • I get what your saying Dariel Dixon.  I have been neck deep in trying to clean up old "why is it here" data on a few occasions and it is painful.  And with technology growing and folks that do not necessarily comprehend the breadth of having and maintaining data does contribute to some very messy data situations.  I have spent many hours combing through individual records trying to figure out if I could identify why/how they ended up in RE and what the story was, what info was on the record etc. that could tell the story and confirm they should be there, even for historical purposes.  It's not just about the dollars and actions.  It all depends on what type of organization you are working at records that have no $$ or action activity still need to be kept for other reasons.  I just caution on delete because once it's gone it's gone and that is the historical integrity of your data that will never be the same or tell the whole story. That's all I'm saying.  
  • Rachel Cavalier
    Rachel Cavalier Community All-Star
    Seventh Anniversary 500 Likes 500 Comments Name Dropper
    I think it depends on your privacy policy. For us, we have some records that are just a name - no gifts, no actions, no events, no address details, no way of knowing why they are in there and quite possibly they are a duplicate of someone who already has a proper record. A lot of these are a holdover from a couple of database softwares back (especially with organisation records and our old DB that had to integrate some of the needs of Finance in a weird way) and when I come across one, I check out when it was created, make sure there's nothing hiding in web view that I can't see in DB view and then mostly they get deleted.


    Similarly there are records what will just be Mr Surname or Mrs Surname and an address - same thing, and if the record is older than what our privacy policy says about holding onto data - it goes. Whoever they are/were our interest in just keeping their name and address doesn't outweigh theirs to have their data (limited though it is) just hang out on our database.


    Certainly for most of these records, none of the colleagues I currently work along side would have been at our organisation when the records were created so definitely no hope of ever figuring out why "Mrs Smith" is in there without an address!

Categories