Donor Advised Funds

Options
2»

Comments

  • Daphne-Ann Singleterry:

    I am curious to learn how other organizations are processing Donor Advised Fund gifts in the Raise'rs Edge?  Since the gift is being recommended by the donor, and technically is the donors money, who's record are you applying the gitt to and who is being soft credited - if anyone?

    When the donor provides contact information, we hard credit to their record and soft credit the broker. If the donor does not provide information, we hard credit the broker. We're considering a change in policy on the latter.

  • Ryan Hyde:

    Aaron - insofar as pledges go, here's my interpretation of what's going on based on my own experience.


    There tend to be two different use cases for pledges in RE; I'll call them "traditional" and "work flow." A traditional pledge is an agreement between the donor and the organization, typically formalized in writing, and logged as income by finance on the date of the pledge (preferably by posting the pledge directly to FE, if you have FE and it's integrated with RE). Based on the language being tossed around here on the forum, I would say that DAF money cannot and should not be used to pay this kind of pledge.


    But "work flow" pledges are different. These pledges are far less formal. They may be promises made verbally or in email, the timeframe for payment isn't usually all that consequential (e.g., so long as it's paid this fiscal year, we're good), and the amounts are typically lower than big formalized pledges (though this doesn't have to be true). These pledges are NOT logged by finance and are NOT posted to FE (if applicable). In these cases, a gift officer may put in a pledge for the donation so that when the gift comes in, our data entry person can see that there's a pledge on the record, apply it, and allow the campaign/fund/appeal/package from the pledge flow to the payment. This keeps the data entry person moving along without much interruption because s/he is sure that the data is what the solicitor expects.


    I would say that in this case, a DAF gift can go ahead and be applied to the pledge, no problem. The pledge is just a record keeping tool at this point and doesn't reflect a formal, legally binding agreement. So if you were putting the DAF gift directly on the constituent record, then really this would just make the whole thing easier to manage. 


    I can see some folks being uncomfortable with this process, but I wouldn't flinch at it myself. 

    Sorry, I have to disagree.  Our finance department records pledges.  Very important during a multi-year campaign.  They can not except a pledge where the donor intends to use a DAF.  This would get audited.


     

  • Brenda Anderson:

    Sorry, I have to disagree.  Our finance department records pledges.  Very important during a multi-year campaign.  They can not except a pledge where the donor intends to use a DAF.  This would get audited.

    Brenna - I do not understand, what are you disagreeing with - We do this same thing. DAF gifts can not be linked to traditional pledges - the ones booked by finance. But the other pledge type we have (clearly marked and clearly NOT booked in finance) is simply a recordkeeping mechanism in RE (not FE) that the business office (and the auditors) would NEVER even see. SO therefore it can't possibly get audited! It simply helps sort out what we "know" is coming but can't be booked because of an IRS technicality.

  • So, how do you designate a "work-flow" pledge, so that it can be easily be identified and not logged by finance? 


    The issue of tracking DAF 'pledges' could be solved if Blackbaud would just create a new gift type entitled DAF similar to the 'Planned Gift' type.


    Thanks, Cheryl

Categories