ZIP+4

Options
We do not use the +4 in our ZIP field.  Should we?  What are the pros and cons?  And if we decide to add them, what is the best way?  Can I update all the addresses some way (Maybe with AddressFinder?)


Thanks for the insight!


Katherine
Tagged:

Comments

  • Hi Katherine,


    I definitely think using the +4 zip is a good way to keep your data clean.  We don't have Address Finder, but I encourage you to use it.


    Lisa
  • The zip + 4 will also be updated via quarterly NCOA

  • roger berg
    roger berg Community All-Star
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Likes 100 Comments Photogenic
    Hi Katherine -

    When adding new records we add the +4. Our mailhouse seems to prefer it so that's what we do. Most of our records had the +4 appended as part of an address finder run several years ago. Address Accelerator would do it as well (I think) but we don't have that in our contract.


    When entering gifts I always check the donor's record to make sure the +4 is there and if not, I add it (google the address and you should get the zip +4).


    Roger
  • We use +4 as well, and we use AddressAccelerator for that. Any new address that comes our way, we run it through Accelerator and assuming the address is correct, it cleans it up and addes the +4 for us. You can also run batches through AddressAccelerator by going to Data Health Center > Data Health Center (middle tab across the top) > Validate Addresses (link in middle left). You can pipe in any query you like and it'll attempt to clean up all addresses it finds. 
  • Hi Katherine,


    We definitely recommend adding and retaining the +4 digits on the zip code field of your addresses.  You can add and maintain this address information using either of our data tools AddressFinder and AddressAccelerator.  AddressFinder is intended to match any new addresses that your constituents submit to the National Change of Address database but it will also review and correct any missing or inaccurate +4 digits of zip codes submitted with your records.  AddressAccelerator is a tool that can be enabled in your Raiser's Edge to allow you to add the +4 digits to a record's address just when reviewing it on an individual basis or you can submit a group of records at once for this process.


    The specific process of adding the +4 digits to the zip code confirms that the address is a valid mailing address per USPS standards.  If AddressFinder or AddressAccelerator cannot add the +4 digits to the address' zip code then the address is not valid or the zip code is incorrect.  To provide a little more background, adding the +4 digits to the zip code is part of the process of CASS (Coding Accuracy Support System) certification and this is designed to improve the accuracy of mailings by verifying addresses against an official list of all known deliverable addresses in the USPS database.  For more information on CASS certification, please take a look at our Knowledgebase article in the link below:


    "What is CASS certification?"

    https://kb.blackbaud.com/articles/Article/41554


    Please let us know if you have any other questions about the +4 digit zip coding and CASS certification.  There really aren't any cons to maintaining this address data on your records as it should always improve the accuracy of your mailings!


    Lee Hodson

    Data Enrichment Services


     
  • Thanks for the insight, everyone!  Looks like the +4 is the way to go.  I just ran AddressFinder last week (for the first time, before that I had only relied on the NCOA reports that I got back from the mailhouse), so next time I run it, I'll be sure to include all addresses and update them for the +4.


    Katherine
  • Or for efficiency, you could write a query that sais "preferred address zip code does not contain -" and just update the ones that have no +4 at all. Just a thought - may not be useful in your scenario.
  • Actually - I do not recommend using AddressFinder for this purpose. Most of us use AddressFinder and choose to only import the records that have changed. We keep the old address, mark it as former then have the new address as preferred.


    If you choose to import all records even if it is just to get the cass certified format (with zip +4) you then have to decide, are you overwriting the existing addresses (thereby not keeping the historical changes if there is a new address) or adding the new address and marking the old as former.


    If you do the latter, for those with a simple zip+4 add, you will now have two copies of the same address on ALL your records. You will soon begin to hate seeing this and you can't easily fix it - you will need to manually delete them. I do not recommend this. I would strongly advocate for using AddressAccelerator for this purpose.
  • This is a great point and to clarify we never recommend submitting All Addresses for AddressFinder especially for this purpose as it will cause duplicate addresses to be returned and duplicate old addresses to be saved on the record.  In general it is best to only submit the Preferred Address for AddressFinder and you can let AddressAccelerator handle any formatting updates for secondary addresses.


    If you are running in to the issue of adding duplicate previous/old addresses on to records when running AddressFinder there is an easy step to avoid this by running a two-pass process covered in the Knowledgebase link below.  This article outlines how you can just update the addresses with NCOA changes (Forwardable Moves) in a first run of the update and save the old addresses.  Then you can make a second run to update all addresses but not select to save old addresses so that each address submitted will be formatted according to CASS certification without adding a duplicate previous address to the record:


    "How to prevent duplicate addresses from being created when running AddressFinder"

    https://kb.blackbaud.com/articles/Article/49322

     
  • I appreciate that there are workarounds but it still will not give you the full benefits that AddressAccelerator gives you such as county and other mail codes.
  • The decision of using AddressFinder or AddressAccelerator to format your addresses could very easily come down to whether you have both services or not.  AddressAccelerator is the better tool for this, and you can run it on one record or many records, as often as you wish.  But there is an additional cost if you don't already have this tool.


    Also, to Lee's post...the last time I used AddressFinder, I believe it was only possible to submit one address per constituent record...no choice to submit all addresses.  So if you submit Preferred, and some of your constituents have their Business address marked as Preferred, you won't get any moves for their Home address.
  • Melissa Graves:

    If you do the latter, for those with a simple zip+4 add, you will now have two copies of the same address on ALL your records. You will soon begin to hate seeing this and you can't easily fix it - you will need to manually delete them.

    To save you deleting them manually, if you can identify your duplicates in Excel then you could change their address type via Import and use the Alternate Address Deleter plug-in. Love that plug-in; we ended up with blank previous addresses on tens of thousands of records due to the way they were imported from our student record system and there was no way I could have cleaned those up without it!

  • We don't have Address Accelorator, and I don't see that as something we would purchase just for this purpose.  Also, EVERY zip in my database is formatted without the +4 at the moment, which we're fine with.  The mailhouse we use adds the +4, and for the smaller mailings that we do in-house, we have very little returned mail (thankfully!)   We did have the problem of duplicate addresses (from before my time!) and I've been able to clean most of those out as I've come across them.  

     
  • Katherine Mannion:

    We don't have Address Accelorator, and I don't see that as something we would purchase just for this purpose.  Also, EVERY zip in my database is formatted without the +4 at the moment, which we're fine with.  The mailhouse we use adds the +4, and for the smaller mailings that we do in-house, we have very little returned mail (thankfully!)   We did have the problem of duplicate addresses (from before my time!) and I've been able to clean most of those out as I've come across them.  

     

    NSKS doesn't have Addr. Accel. either.  As others mentioned, mailservices do a great job both with expanding to zip+4 AND providing address updates.  We find it is easier to import ALL address corrections the mailhouse provides with each newsletter (& check if any of the moves affects our other addr. lists like Auction-Tracker).  Once we have the zip+4 in our RE addresses, the comparison/corrections for the next newsletter updates is MUCH easier!

    On addr. changes:  we make sure to keep but deactivate an old address.  Then we import the new addrs. as the primary addr.  We get about 200 addr. updates per newsletter (~1%).  By using zip+4 in RE, the update is easier.

    Now if only we could resolve addresses that don't have zip+4 addrs. & sometimes get returned...

Categories