"Title" as an optional field in targeted advocacy actions: please vote for my "Idea"

Jason Gohlke

I had a very good conversation with our CSM Caroline Stuart-Freas today. She has thoroughly convinced me of the value of posting ideas, since just putting them aside and moving on to the next thing is much less likely to result in improvements to LO than will posting them for all to see, discuss, and vote on.


I actually submitted an idea the other week that applies specifically to state-level advocacy (please vote for it if you agree). "Title" being a required field is actually suppressing participation for us [it's not even on state legislators' forms] and should simply be made optional for our state-level advocacy actions. Here's the link:

Allow "Title" to be optional, not required, in advocacy forms

Please see the idea for more details.


Caroline also mentioned some very intriguing things about the next iteration of Luminate Online (currently dubbed "LO BETA"). Because I couldn't resist being first, I created an idea in the "LO-BETA" section of Luminate Ideas that I hope you will all agree with and vote for:

Allow items to be moved between campaigns after they've been created

Again, please see the idea for more details.


Thanks!

Caroline Stuart-Freas

Thanks for posting this Jason! I'll make sure to mention it to other BB staff and advocacy clients too.