Fraudulent constituents

Options

Just asking how you mark constituent records that turn out to be Fraudulent. We're thinking of a constituent code instead of an attribute.

And then we'll probably have a business rule that will have a message when someone opens the record or possibly attempts to do gift entry (in batch). 

Comments

  • Howard Marmorstein:

    Just asking how you mark constituent records that turn out to be Fraudulent. We're thinking of a constituent code instead of an attribute.

    And then we'll probably have a business rule that will have a message when someone opens the record or possibly attempts to do gift entry (in batch). 

    I've never heard of a fraudulent constituent record, what does that mean?
  • Josh Bekerman:
    I've never heard of a fraudulent constituent record, what does that mean?

    We sometimes get online credit card transactions that turns out to be fraudulent - stolen cards, for example. We do create the record for the constituent. We even have checks written from one account that keep getting bounced so we assume they were stolen.

  • Howard Marmorstein:

    We sometimes get online credit card transactions that turns out to be fraudulent - stolen cards, for example. We do create the record for the constituent. We even have checks written from one account that keep getting bounced so we assume they were stolen.

    I would definitely make a business rule that gives warning whenever you open the record or enter a gift!

    As to whether you use attributes or constituent codes to mark them as fraudulent, I would look at how you use both those codes in normally. Generally, I avoid adding a new const code, since those tend to multiply themselves all too easily. Whether you use an attribute or const code, I would also add a solicit code (or attribute if you use those for solicit codes) of "DO NOT Contact for any reason" - or whatever code your org uses to mark constituents who should never receive any communication.

  • Howard Marmorstein:

    Just asking how you mark constituent records that turn out to be Fraudulent. We're thinking of a constituent code instead of an attribute.

    And then we'll probably have a business rule that will have a message when someone opens the record or possibly attempts to do gift entry (in batch). 

    Our gift processors are VERY good at identifying the fraudulent transactions before they get to batch. So we are able to delete them from the BBNC plugin & refund the charge before an inaccurate record gets created in RE.

Categories