Spousal Records and Deceased Donors in RE

Options
Adriana Cavell
Adriana Cavell ✭
Fifth Anniversary Photogenic First Reply
in Blackbaud Raiser's Edge NXT®: General Discussion
I work in Estate Administration so I spend a lot of time thinking about how we handle deceased donors in Raiser's Edge. I am new at my organization and I’ve noticed something that has caused me some concern: when we receive notification that a donor has passed away, the record is marked as deceased regardless of if there is a spouse on the record. Consequently, the spouse is no longer receiving any communication (appeals or otherwise), solicitation, or stewardship anymore.


I've been discussing this at length with our IT team and we've come up with a couple of options but we're not sure which is the best approach.


1) Swap the spouses on the record so the living spouse is now the main constituent.  However, we’re concerned with this causing tax receipt issues since the living donor could request that the tax receipts be reissued in their name. I intend to reach out to the Canadian Revenue Agency to get more information.

2) Create a second record for the living spouse and move all the pertinent information (address, cons codes, appeals, attributes, notes, actions, proposals) from the main/deceased record into the spouse’s record. Gifts would to be soft credited. This gets around the tax receipt issue but it means that we no longer have the history in the deceased’s record.

I’m very interested to hear what other organizations have done and if there is an industry best practice for how to handle these situations.

 
Tagged:

Comments

  • Leslie McGeady
    Leslie McGeady ✭
    Eighth Anniversary Facilitator 1 Name Dropper Photogenic
    We have been working to streamline this process too.  We start a new record for the surviving spouse, unless they are also an alumni in which case they would have a separate record.  The constituency code we use is Surviving Spouse.  We merge records with caution.  Relationships aren't accurately transferable so take some time.


    As Katherine suggested, some of this can be automated.  I'm eager to hear other suggestions too.  Good luck!
  • Adriana Cavell
    Adriana Cavell ✭
    Fifth Anniversary Photogenic First Reply
    I agree that it makes sense to personalize the spousal record if you have an existing relationship with one or both of the couple but a lot of these are cases of DM donors. If we only move a small amount of the data over, then they probably wouldn't fall in the same data set. I think that's my biggest concern.


    How would you handle those situations?
  • Dariel Dixon 2
    Dariel Dixon 2 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seventh Anniversary Facilitator 4 Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think it depends on how the data is being grouped.  If the main criteria is giving, and if the soft credits are in, the spousal record should pull as long as you have included soft credits in the query options.  If the criteria is something else, I'd consider adding the missing code/attribute/whatever.  Obviously, volume would be a factor as well.


    But your concern is more than valid.  Obviously, you know your data better than anyone, any making sure that those spousal records is included in the data set is paramount.  
  • Elizabeth Rich
    Elizabeth Rich ✭
    Tenth Anniversary Facilitator 1 Photogenic
    In that case, we would make the spouse a constituent and give them a solicit code of "mail to" which includes them in our mailings.
  • J Baumann
    J Baumann ✭
    Ancient Membership Facilitator 1
    Adriana -

       I've done it both ways, depending upon the organization with which I'm working.  My preferred way is to swap the spouses, but I'm a fan of fewer records.  The surviving spouse didn't start giving when the first spouse passed away and most spouses give together.  I'll add - that typically schools with records for alumni are the typical exceptions to this.  I don't think, in using RE since 1997, I've every had an issue with a surviving spouse requesting a tax receipt without all giving recorded on it.  


     
  • Jocelyne Hamoline
    Jocelyne Hamoline ✭
    Ninth Anniversary Photogenic First Reply
    We swap the spouses.  In Canada, a charitable tax receipt can be used by both donors, so if the main constituent dies, then either his living spouse or his estate can use the charitable tax receipt.  It can also be split between the living spouse and the estate.  As long as the gift was made before the constituent died.  So, for us, this is the only way we record deceased persons.  This allows for the living donor to continue to receive mail without the deceased person's name on the mailing.  
  • Diana Turner
    Diana Turner ✭
    Ninth Anniversary Facilitator 1 Photogenic
    We have two scenarios - 1 - both spouses are constituents and either they give separately or as a couple (meaning 1 is soft credited). If a spouse dies, we mark the record as deceased and make the surviving spouse the "head of household". 

    2 - a constituent dies and the spouse is not a constituent - you can add the non-constituent as a constituent by opening the spouse link and going to the relationship tab and using the add this individual as a constituent. The addressing information and any other information you have on the individual's relationship record will populate to the constituent record.

    You will only see the very basic information on the "new" constituent record. 


    I use the system to make changes automatically when a constituent's record is marked as deceased. This helps a great deal in not forgetting to make necessary changes to addressee information. 
    ecbfdb67d4b31152a61f9aad58466f56-huge-bu

     
  • Angela May
    Angela May ✭
    Ancient Membership Facilitator 1 Photogenic
    Hi! I vote for #2, and agree with what was mentioned before about picking and choosing what goes to the new record.


    I create a new record for the surviving spouse, and use the business rules for deceased record processing (as mentioned previously) to automate many of the tasks. I then use the constituent merge tool to merge SOME information over to the surviving spouse's record (i.e things that we need to retain, but not necessarily on the decedent's record). However, that merge tool removes the information from the decedent's record, so, since I want to keep a history on the decedent's record for historical tracking, some information has to be exported/imported (essentially "copied to"  the new spouse record) using export and then ImportOmatic. An example of something I merge over is appeals (rationale is, these appeals applied to the couple when they shared a record, I no longer need to know how we appealed to the decedent, but I definitely want to know how we appealed to the surviving spouse, because we use appeal history to inform future appeal segmentation, i.e are they an individual who traditionally gives in response to an end-of-year appeal). An example of something I export/import is Notes, which usually need to be retained on both records.
  • JoAnn Strommen
    JoAnn Strommen ✭✭✭✭✭
    Ancient Membership Facilitator 4 Name Dropper Photogenic
    I also vote for #2 with moving selected data to spouse record.  I know some orgs choose to swap names but in my experience that really messes up some types of data like board/committee service, interests, education, business etc.  So much cleaner to use deceased options to create a new record for spouse if they do not have one and move/copy the info desired.

Categories